Flick to turn the page
A Mindway Guide
4

Signs You're Overpaying for Your EAP

The hidden costs baked into most EAPs, and what the right price looks like for teams of 5 to 200.

Ryder McKenzie
Ryder McKenzie
Founder, Mindway EAP
Tap or click to flick through
mindwaymindwayeap.com.au

Why I wrote this
in the 1st place

Most companies have no idea what their EAP should cost. There's no price list to compare against, no benchmark, no way to know if the invoice landing every year is fair or wildly inflated.

Providers like it that way. When nobody can compare, nobody negotiates. So companies with 30 staff end up on pricing structures designed for companies with 3,000, paying for a service most of their team will never touch.

I started Mindway after watching this play out over and over. This guide covers the four ways you end up overpaying without realising it, what to look for instead, and the exact questions to take into your next renewal.

Ryder McKenzie
Ryder McKenzie
Founder, Mindway EAP
mindwayPage 2 of 13
Who this guide is for

HR leads and owners at companies of 5 to 200

This guide is for the person who signs off on the EAP invoice at a company with more than 5 employees and fewer than 200. Sometimes that's an HR lead. Just as often it's the owner, doing HR on top of everything else.

You want to properly support your team, and you're happy to pay for something that works. What you don't want is to keep paying enterprise prices for a service nobody uses and nobody can measure.

Whether your renewal is coming up or you're comparing providers for the first time, the next few pages will show you exactly where the money leaks out.

mindwayPage 3 of 13
1
Sign one

You're paying full price for a service almost nobody uses

The price on the invoice isn't the real problem. What you get for it is. Across the industry, only around 5% of staff engage with their EAP in a given year.

A handful of sessions, a launch email nobody remembers, and silence for the other eleven months. That's what the invoice buys at most providers.

And here's the uncomfortable part: your provider has no reason to fix it. Every session costs them money, so low usage quietly protects their margins. They got paid the moment you signed. Whether anyone engages is your problem.

~5%
Share of staff who engage with most EAPs in a year. Same invoice, almost no value.
mindwayPage 4 of 13
What fair looks like

An EAP that earns its fee all year

  • Value is more than session counts. Counselling when someone needs it, wellbeing content the whole team sees monthly, and support managers can actually point people to.
  • Something for the 95% too. Most of your team won't book a session this year, and that's fine. Proactive content and early check-ins mean they still get something for the fee.
  • A provider on the hook for engagement. Ask any provider their average utilisation across clients. If they dodge the question, that's your answer.
28–40%
Staff utilisation Mindway clients see. Most EAPs sit around 5%.
mindwayPage 5 of 13
2
Sign two

Your pricing was built for a corporate 10x your size

Per seat pricing. Minimum headcounts. Contracts that lock you in for one to three years. Implementation fees, account management fees, fees for reports you'll never read.

None of that structure was designed for a team of 30 or 80. It was designed for corporates with procurement departments, then sold down to everyone else without changing the price logic.

To an enterprise provider, you're a rounding error. Which means you get their price structure without any of their negotiating power.

mindwayPage 6 of 13
What fair looks like

Pricing sized for your headcount

  • Flat annual pricing. One number for your whole team, published upfront. No per seat games, no surprise fees per session.
  • No long lock-ins. A provider that's confident in the service doesn't need a three year contract to keep you paying.
  • No hidden extras. Implementation, account management and reporting should be included, not itemised as add-ons after you've signed.
  • Setup in minutes, not months. If implementation needs a project plan, you're paying for complexity that wasn't built for you.
mindwayPage 7 of 13
3
Sign three

Your money funds a call centre, not counselling

Think about what sits between your invoice and an actual session with most providers: a 1800 line, triage staff reading scripts, schedulers, account managers, a portal stacked with features nobody opens.

All of that overhead comes out of what you pay. And it doesn't just cost money. It costs sessions. People wait days for a callback, get offered whichever counsellor has a gap weeks out, and plenty give up before the first session ever happens.

So you're paying for infrastructure that actively stops your team getting help.

Weeks
Common wait from first call to first session with most providers. Distress doesn't wait that long.
mindwayPage 8 of 13
What fair looks like

Your money goes to sessions

  • Matched to a counsellor within 24 hours. The window where someone is ready to talk is short. A fair provider meets them in it.
  • Direct booking. Staff book straight into a counsellor's calendar. No call centre, no triage queue, no overhead you're funding.
  • A real choice of counsellor. Fit is everything. A bad match means a wasted session you paid for and a person who never books again.
  • Telehealth or in person. Whatever suits shift workers, remote staff and people on site.
mindwayPage 9 of 13
4
Sign four

You can't see what your money bought

Here's the simplest test of whether you're overpaying: can you say what your EAP did last quarter? For most companies the honest answer is a shrug, or a quarterly PDF full of jargon that answers nothing.

If you can't see sessions delivered, what people came in for, or whether it helped, you have no way to judge value. You're not buying an outcome, you're buying an invoice.

Providers that can't show you results are betting you'll keep paying anyway. Most companies do.

mindwayPage 10 of 13
What fair looks like

Proof of value, strict privacy

  • Three numbers that matter. Sessions delivered, the split between work and personal issues, and the themes coming up.
  • Privacy thresholds built in. Theme and reason data should lock automatically whenever numbers get low enough to identify someone.
  • Feedback after every session. Your provider should be measuring whether sessions actually helped, and showing you.
  • Something for the WHS file. A clear record of support offered and used goes a long way if a psychosocial claim ever lands. That's value you can point to.
mindwayPage 11 of 13
Take this to your next renewal

Seven questions to work out if you're overpaying

  1. What's the total annual cost for my headcount, all inclusive?
  2. Beyond counselling, what does my team get for the fee month to month?
  3. What's your average staff utilisation across clients like us?
  4. How fast is someone matched to a counsellor, in hours or days?
  5. Can staff book directly, or must they go through a call centre?
  6. What exactly will I see in reporting, and how is privacy protected?
  7. What's the contract term, and what does exiting look like?
mindwayPage 12 of 13
At the end of the day

Pay for an EAP your team actually uses

Mindway is an independent, Australian owned EAP built from day one for teams of 5 to 200. Flat pricing published upfront, no lock-ins, and usage you can see.

28–40%
Typical staff utilisation
24 hrs
Counsellor matching
30 min
Setup, start to finish
Flat
Annual pricing, upfront
See what your team should be paying
mindwaymindwayeap.com.au
1 / 13