Get Tailored Quote
EAP Provider vs In-House Wellbeing Programs in Australia | Workplace Wellbeing Guide
Last Updated 08/12/25 By Vanessa Cortez
EAP Programs @ Mindway EAP
There are two options for wellness programs in Australia: in-house initiatives or partnerships with groups that provide EAPs. Both approaches have their benefits and drawbacks; whether one is ideal for your business will rely on things like resources, goals, and employees.

Making the right choice is more important than ever before since employee health has a direct correlation to retention, productivity, and performance, and because compliance duties under WHS guidelines are increasing. Companies incur hidden expenses due to personnel burnout, absenteeism, and disengagement when they do not provide adequate support.

Need some advice on how to make a decision that will work best for your company? This article takes a look at two popular methods and compares and contrasts them: managing wellness in-house and outsourcing to an EAP service.

What You’ll Learn in This Article
  • The core differences between EAP providers and in-house wellbeing programs
  • Advantages of outsourcing wellbeing support to an EAP
  • Benefits and challenges of building in-house programs
  • Cost and compliance considerations for each option
  • Real-world examples of when each approach works best
  • How to assess your organisation’s needs before deciding
  • Practical recommendations for a hybrid approach

Understanding EAP Providers vs In-House Programs

Organizations outside of the company that deal with employees and their families are called EAP providers. They offer services like professional counseling, wellness initiatives, and crisis relief. They provide information, anonymity, and structure that are lacking in-house for most companies.

When a company develops and manages its own wellness initiatives, it does it using its own resources and employees. A mental health first aid course, peer support groups, wellness workshops, or even a full-time counsellor could be available.

The primary focus of employee assistance programs (EAPs) is on providing confidential, outside support, whereas internal programs aim to integrate and be visible within the workplace culture. Recognizing this distinction is the initial stage in deciding whether approach is suitable for your team. The first step in selecting the method that works for your staff is to understand this difference.

You:
We’re deciding whether to stick with our wellbeing committee or partner with an EAP provider. What do you think?
employee:
It’s great having wellbeing activities here, but sometimes I need more personal, private support. Having both would make me feel more secure.

Benefits of Choosing an EAP Provider

Partnering with an EAP provider ensures employees have access to qualified professionals across multiple delivery channels, phone, video, chat, or face-to-face. EAPs often provide 24/7 support, making them suitable for shift-based industries such as healthcare, mining, and hospitality.

Confidentiality is another major benefit. Employees may feel more comfortable opening up to an external counsellor than to an in-house staff member. This increases trust and, in turn, usage rates.

EAP providers also handle critical incident response, provide manager coaching, and help workplaces stay compliant with mental health obligations under Fair Work Australia and WorkSafe Victoria. For many employers, outsourcing ensures peace of mind and professional consistency.

Strengths of In-House Wellbeing Programs

In-house programs allow organisations to design wellbeing initiatives that directly reflect company culture and values. For example, a startup may run weekly resilience workshops, or a school might train staff in peer-to-peer mental health support.
These programs often feel more integrated into daily workplace life and may encourage broader participation. Employees see their leaders visibly investing in wellbeing, which can strengthen workplace culture and morale.

However, the success of in-house programs depends on resources, staff training, and long-term commitment. Without the right expertise, in-house initiatives can lack depth or fail to maintain confidentiality.

"Workplace wellbeing is most effective when it blends cultural commitment with professional expertise. That’s why many organisations succeed by combining in-house initiatives with external EAP providers." – Beyond Blue

Cost Considerations

EAP services are usually priced per employee per year or per session, which can be cost-effective for small to medium businesses that cannot justify hiring in-house staff. They also save costs on training, infrastructure, and program management.

In-house programs may seem cheaper at first, especially if organisations start with workshops or internal committees. But hidden costs, staff time, turnover of trained leaders, and inconsistent delivery, can add up. Over time, many organisations find EAPs offer better value per dollar spent, especially when utilisation rates are high.

Compliance and Risk Management

Under Australian WHS laws, employers must manage psychosocial risks in the workplace. An EAP provider can play a critical role in compliance by:
  • Offering confidential counselling that reduces risks of harm.
  • Providing usage reports (without breaching confidentiality).
  • Supporting employees after incidents to prevent long-term harm.

In-house programs may support wellbeing culture but are less likely to meet compliance standards on their own. Employers who rely solely on internal efforts may unintentionally expose themselves to legal risk.

A manufacturing company in Victoria partnered with an EAP provider to address high absenteeism and stress-related claims. By offering 24/7 counselling and critical incident support, staff reported improved morale, and WorkSafe-related claims decreased by 20% in one year.

In contrast, a tech startup in Sydney launched an in-house wellbeing initiative. Weekly mindfulness sessions and leadership coaching became part of their culture. While successful for a small team, the founders eventually integrated an EAP as the company scaled, recognising the need for professional counselling beyond what in-house leaders could offer.

Hybrid Approaches: The Best of Both Worlds

Many Australian organisations are now adopting a hybrid model, combining EAP services with in-house initiatives. For example, an EAP may provide counselling and crisis support, while the organisation delivers day-to-day wellness programs like fitness classes, stress workshops, or recognition schemes.

This dual approach maximises coverage: employees get confidential professional help when they need it and experience visible cultural support every day at work.

Key Takeaways
  • EAPs Provide Expertise and Confidentiality
    External providers offer professional support employees trust.
  • In-House Programs Build Culture
    Internal initiatives strengthen visible commitment to wellbeing.
  • Cost and Compliance Differ
    EAPs are cost-effective for many and better for WHS compliance.
  • Hybrid Models Work Best
    Combining EAP with internal efforts creates a well-rounded approach.
Looking for Help with an EAP?
We Customise Every Program to Fit Your Organisation
PAYG EAP
Flexible Support - Billed Per Session

Ideal for organisations that want to start small and scale as needed. Only pay when your team uses the service.


Included in PAYG:

✔️ Pay per session model

✔️ Tailored Mindfulness Program

✔️ Professional support within 12–36 hours

✔️ 24/7/365 booking number

✔️ Real-time analytics portal

+ see full benefits

Get Tailored Quote
Complete EAP
All-Inclusive Support

Best for teams seeking consistent, proactive support with built-in sessions and added value for managers and leaders.


Includes everything in PAYG, plus:

✔️ Set sessions included per employee, per year.

✔️ Dedicated program specialist

✔️ Priority critical incident support

✔️ Monthly live leadership/manager training (mental health, leadership, communication & more)

+ see full benefits

Get Tailored Quote
"We’re extremely satisfied with the services and counselling provided. It’s great to see our staff benefiting from it." 28% of staff use services
Priya, HR Director

Get Instant Tailored Quote